Thursday, 27 April 2017

Week 5 Shakespeare Today

SHAKESPEARE TODAY

Shakespeare’s plays have been read and performed for over 400 years. Most students study some of his work in school from Year 9.  There have been changes in how Shakespeare’s work is presented over the years, and it is sometimes quiet different to how the plays would have originally been performed.

Place of Performance

In Shakespeare’s time, plays were performed either in the yards of inns, private home or later in dedicated buildings after the first theatre was built. The theatre’s, like today’s Globe, would have been open to the elements and therefore very severe weather could lead to a performance being cancelled.  Over time, performances in theatres became the norm, and while some theatres had different layouts, they would have been similar in terms of having a stage, seating, a backstage area, and bigger venues would have had balconies with more seating.  More recently however, there has been a trend for plays to be held outside again during the summer months. For example, in Wales, there is an annual Shakespeare play performed in the grounds of the Abergavenny castle. For films and tv adaptations, performances take place in studios and sometimes in different places around the world.








Inside The Globe in London

The Royal Shakespeare Company in Stratford


Abergavenny Castle in Wales where Shakespeare is performed in the Summer  

Another difference between performance venues in Shakespeare’s times and now is comfort that audience experience. In Elizabethan times there would have been no comfortable seating, no clean toilet facilities and the audience would have been at the mercy of the weather, getting cold and wet, or getting sunburn. Today, most theatre seats are comfortable, theatres have heating and air conditioning and lots of toilet facilities.

Electricity and Lighting

In Elizabethan England there was no electricity, so lighting, if used at all, for effect or for performances indoors, would have been candle or torchlight. Because of these limitations, performances were mainly held during the hours of daylight. Today, lighting plays a huge part in performances, from the general lights in theatres, to the stage lights used for lighting effects, spot lights and so on. We rely much more on lighting in performances today to create mood and convey atmosphere.




Audience

Audiences are quite different today. In Shakespeare’s time, plays were aimed at the masses, from poor people who were not literate and who had never left their town or country, to Queen Elizabeth herself. The audience were not expected to sit in silence, but they would have chatted, shouted out, and interacted with the actors. They could eat and drink during performances, go out and come back in and so on. In the 20th Century the majority of audience members were literate and generally middle class or higher. They would have studied his work at school. Their experience was different as well because Shakespeare was seen as high art and you would have to be silent during performances and eating and drinking or leaving and going back in was not allowed. Today there is more of a combination. You can pay a lot of money for some performances and attend plays where there is a big performer/audience divide, but there are also many venues and performances where audience members are interacted with, and in outdoor performances, for example the ones at Abergavenny Castle, people are encouraged to bring picnics.

Makeup and costume

In Elizabethan times, heavy makeup was used by the actors, but the makeup could cause health problems because there was a lot of lead in it. Today, while makeup is used, it is safe. Make up is sometimes subtle, but at other times it is used to create incredible effects, like glow in the dark features. With better makeup and experienced makeup artists, actors can be made to look convincingly older, younger, male or female, or not human at all.

In Shakespeare’s times, costumes would have been mainly their own clothes, with added items like capes. Today, it depends on the context the play is set in. Actors may be dressed in Elizabethan era clothing, or jeans and t-shirts, or elaborate costumes.
SFX and Staging

We now have the ability to create and use many different types of special effects for plays on stage and on screen. There are many different lighting effects that can be created, complex sound systems with computers can make a range of sound effects and play complex backing tracks. On screen, CGI can be used too. With better technology stages can rotate and rise or fall. This all means that sometimes today’s performances can be much more complex and challenging. There are however performances that are still quite simple in terms of staging and SFX however.

Context, Time and Place

While Shakespeare set his places in several different times and places, for many years those performances contexts have stayed the same. There are however, many performances that are now set in different times, places and contexts. For example, a number of years ago there was a performance at The Globe where the play was set in the 1930s. There have been performances set in 70s, the 90s/00s, in Japan, in Africa etc. Today directors like to explore how Shakespeare’s work can be relevant for different times and places – the stories of love, power struggles, betrayal and magic, are stories found everywhere. For example, The Globe had a long festival where performances of Shakespeare’s plays were set in different countries and performed in different languages.






The 1957 film Throne of Blood, by legendary Japanese director Kurosawa, was a Japanese interpretation of Macbeth, set in the Samurai period.

(Screen shot of Throne of Blood)

Language

Aside from the performance of Shakespeare in different languages, we also play today with putting Shakespeare into modern speech, into rap, into sign language. Directors are  always exploring ways to disseminate Shakespeare’s work to wider audience, and to make it relevant to their experiences.

Types of Performances

While In Shakespearean times plays were performed on stage or perhaps in a noble person’s house, today we have many more ways of present his work to the public.
·         Live performances in theatres
·         Live performances outside
·         TV adaptations
·         Film adaptations
·         Radio adaptations (narrated and full cast performances)
·         Animated versions
·         Performances that have been recorded in a theatre and then shown in cinemas, either live or at a later date.
The fact that there is a call for all these methods shows how relevant and popular Shakespeare’s work is today. In some ways, despite the methods, this is nearer to Shakespeare’s time as the work is accessible to all people in society.

Gender

One of the key things about Elizabethan theatre was that women were not allowed to perform on stage as it was frowned upon. Men and boys therefore played the female roles. Over time however, things have changed, with women eventually being allowed on stage, and then later taking on female and male Shakespearean roles. For example, Charlotte Charke played many male characters including Hamlet in the 18th Century. In fact, there have been many performances where the role of Hamlet has been played by a woman, and recently Maxine Peake stared as Hamlet at the Royal Exchange Theatre. (https://www.theguardian.com/stage/gallery/2014/sep/26/female-hamlets-sarah-bernhardt-maxine-peake-in-pictures).

Another example of gender reversal, or when gender is used as a key concept in contemporary performances would be the Y12 performance of Macbeth here at the Brit. In this production there are no male actors at all. We are also exploring the issues of gender equality and stereotyping in the performance. For example, do we view women performing the violent deeds differently from how we view men doing the same things? How do we balance gender equality without losing what makes us women? In fact, what does make us women?


Shakespeare’s work will remain valid and relevant – his stories tell the stories of our lives, and can be appreciated in almost any culture around the world. We all love, we all experience betrayal, and we all experience power struggles. We can relate to his work because it is based on human experience that does not change in essence over time.

Thursday, 20 April 2017

Week 4 Theatres, actors

Theatres, Actors and Acting in Shakespeare’s Times

In Shakespeare’s time, a stage wasn’t only one type of space; plays had to be versatile in order to be produced again in an outdoor playhouse, an indoor theatre, a royal palace or for a company on tour. In all of these settings, men and boys played all of the characters, as acting in England was an exclusively male profession. The stage itself was relatively bare. For most of the time, playwrights used vivid words instead of scenery to picture the scene onstage.

In 1576, when Shakespeare was still 12 years old in Stratford, James Burbage built the theatre just outside London. The theatre was among the first playhouses in England since the Roman times. It was a multi sided structure with a central uncovered yard.


One of the most notable parts of the acting experience is that all roles would have been played by men and boys. Until 1660 women were not meant to be seen on stage in public as it was seen as immoral. While this arguably meant more work for men, it was not without problems for them.  For example, male actors would have been heavily made up to resemble women, and the make up that they, and women used in daily life contained a high concentration of lead.  Today we know that lead can cause poisoning, leading to illness and death, and lots of skin issues.

The Chamberlain’s Men earned around 10 shillings in London but around 5 shillings outside the city for a week of performances. This was a considerable amount as it cost around 4 pence to feed a man for the day, with a loaf of bread costing ony 1 penny, the same as a groundling (yard standing) ticket.  
The actors would have received one copy of a script and would have had to copy out their own lines to learn them. They would also have to write the cues before their lines. However, to complicate matters, they were often having to learn for, and perform, several plays at the same time as a play was never performed two days in a row. Additionally, they would only perform in natural light generally, so plays were performed mid-afternoon. Actors were sometimes not given their roles until the day of the performance. There were however prompts backstage who would whisper the lines just before actors were to say them.  This is very different to today when even short plays have months of rehearsals.

As well as actors, there would have been musicians, or actors who were musically talented to perform at the end of plays and to accompany songs within plays. This is something that has only made a comeback relatively recently in Shakespearean plays. In many performances at the Globe, there is now live music played on replica instruments that accompany the production and music is played to accompany the songs that would have been accompanied when originally performed.

Shakespeare himself acted in several performances in front of Elizabeth, and in several roles. Researchers believe he may have performed in Macbeth amongst other plays.  









Sources




Thursday, 13 April 2017

Week 3 - Shakespeare's London and Elizabethan audiences

Shakespeare’s London and Elizabeth Audiences
What London was like in Elizabethan times?

Map of Elizabethan London

London in Elizabethan times was a bustling city, full of many different types of people, different trades, and full of entertainment. The population of London increased from 70,000 to 200,000 during this period. London had got so crowded that a Swiss visitor said “One simply cannot walk along the streets of the crowed.” and another visitor described it as “dark and narrow.” This much overcrowding meant that thieves became more attracted and diseases were spread more easily. In some ways, London was not so different to how it is now. However, Elizabethan London also had a lot of problems. For example, there was a lot of crime because there were many poor people, and no system to help them.  Another problem was that London was very dirty, filthy in fact. There was no sewage system or proper rubbish systems.  The streets would have been filled with rubbish, human and animal waste because people just left things where they fell, and people emptied their chamber pots into the streets. The smell must have been awful.

Homes in London looked quite different to today, although there are still some Elizabethan buildings.


These are Elizabethan buildings that were still standing in the early 20th century near Holborn. You can see how the top floors, overhang the bottom. In some streets, if you leaned out of a top floor window you could touch the opposite building.

This shows what the inside of Elizabethan buildings looked like. This is a picture from a large hall but the building and design methods are the same for all Tudor buildings.

Below is a 3D animation that was created to show what London looked like before the Great Fire of London. Although it is an idea of what London was like a little after Elizabeth’s death, London did not change that much. Therefore it gives you a really good idea of what the city was like.


People in Elizabethan times were at risk of many illnesses, especially in London. Because of so many people living close together, and the waste everywhere, diseases spread quickly. Personal hygiene wasn’t good either, with a lot of people thinking that too much washing was bad for you and using twigs to clean their teeth. Dirty water could spread cholera, so people would drink a weak beer instead, there was typhoid, vomiting from dirty water, and also outbreaks of the plague. Many babies and children died very young.  You could call a doctor if you could afford it, but they may not have been very useful. They used leeches, bloodletting and poultices to try to treat many illnesses. However, many things that we survive easily today could be very dangerous during the period.

Living in London had a lot of benefits though. It could be easier to survive than relying on farming and it may give you an easier life. You also had plenty of entertainment opportunities. There were theatres opening, plays in inns, bear baiting and cock and dog fighting, and plenty of places to eat and drink. Some of the entertainment would make us shocked today, for example the ones that involve animal cruelty, but life in Tudor England was very different.



This is an engraving by CJ Visscher, showing the area around London Bridge and all the shops on the bridge.

Working in London

Finding work was very difficult and a lot of people wanted a job at the same time so not many were available. This caused many people to be unemployed. Jobs that people had depended on which class they were in. Classes were divided by The Monarch, Nobility, Gentry, Merchant, Yeomanry and Labourers. Monarch being the highest class and Labourers being the lowest.

  • Monarch - Ruler and leaders
  • Nobility - Knights
  • Gentry - Knights and squires
  • Merchants - Making material
  • Yeomany - Farmers, tradesmen and craftsmen
  • Labourers - Artisans, shoemakers, carpenters, brick builders or anything that means you’re working with your hands.




What were the audiences and their experiences like?

Audiences: By 1600 London theatres could hold 3000 people for the most popular plays. This meant that between 10,000 and 20,000 people a week were attending London theatres. Just about everyone in society attended the theatre. Generally it was more men than women. Even Royalty loved watching the plays.

Cost: In open air theatres, the rice was really cheap! It was only 1 penny to get a place to stand in the yard around the stage. For another penny you could have seat in the lower galleries surrounding the yard and for a penny more you could sit on a cushion. These low costs were the reason theatre was so popular.

Behaviour of audience members: Audiences didn’t sit in silence as they do today. They clapped the heroes and booed the villains and cheered the special effects. Thieves were common in audiences and occasionally fights would break out.  They could buy food and drink in the theatre and may well have been very rowdy. It would have been an intense sensory experience due to the sounds and smells, particularly in the yard section where people would have been crammed in together.

Performance venues: Performances in yards would have been standing only, and open to the elements. Indoor theatres were slightly different. Upper class women would have sat in the balcony seats and some would have worn masks to avoid being recognised. At theatres like The Globe, the standing area was open to the weather so the audience would get wet, sunburned, and so on, but the performance would still go on.
No one knows for sure what the Globe interior looked like as there are no surviving images. However, The Swan is a suggested example for comparison.







Johannes de Witt's sketch of the Swan Theatre



Theatres were often overcrowded, and this made the spread of colds and other illnesses much easier. In fact, theatres we closed during outbreaks of bubonic plague to try and halt spread of it.

Sources

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/destinations/europe/uk/london/10404898/3D-animation-see-London-as-it-looked-before-the-Great-Fire.html)